Nestle

August 31, 2010

Stock price: SF52,2
Conclusion: Superior pricing power combined with earnings quality. We reconfirm our valuation range (SF59-SF62 per share).

H1 results: sales up 5.7% to SF55.3bn (food and beverage +5.7% organic)-EBIT up 13.6%-EPS+13.6%. Guidance 2011: around +5% organic growth and EBIT margin improvement.

We expect Nestle to further rerate against peers.

The only large cap combining volume and pricing.
Organic growth reached 5.7%, driven by volume (+4.2%) and also pricing (+1.5%).
-Nestle’s growth drivers include emerging markets (35% of sales) up 11.3% in H1. Nestle’s exposure is even greater in dairy (80%), powdered beverages (65%), infant nutrition (50%), ambiant culinary, soluble coffee and confectionery. Nestle is still under-exposed in certain categories such as ice cream, water, pet care or frozen foods. Management has not seen any indication of any slowdown in any emerging market.
Nestle managed to grow even in Western Europe (+2.5% organic on average in the last five years).
- Solid pricing power in a challenging environment. Unlike peers Danone or Unilever, Nestle preserved positive pricing in all regions, Europe, America and zone AOA. Water was the only division to report negative pricing in H1. Beverages, confectionery and milk products reported above average price increases.

Bottom line reflects a virtuous circle
-Gross margin could be up 80bp in 2010, less than in H1 (+160bp) due to input costs headwind, notably in confectionery, nutrition and water. Nestle expects input costs to rise at the top end of its +2-3% forecast. As result, pricing should stop trending down and stabilize in H2.
-Distribution and administrative costs should continue to benefit from savings (down 40 and 20bp respectively in H1). According to CFO, “the best is still to come from Globe processes and data systems” Nestle expects to save around SF1.5 bn per year vs SF1bn in the past through synergies, increased simplicity, speed and flexibility.
-Innovation will require further increase in marketing spending (up 140bp in H1).
-One should also highlight the absence of major restructuring charges which often pollute competitors earnings (cf Unilever).
All in all we expect sales to reach SF106bn, EBIT margin to reach 13.5% in the core F&B business and net earnings to achieve SF11.1bn-EPS SF3.27.

Nestle has just completed the sale of Alcon to Novartis for $28.3bn.
-We expect free cash to achieve SF8.1bn this year.
-Following the disposal of Alcon and SF10bn projected share buy back, we forecast net debt to fall below SF1.2bn by the end of December.
-Nestle targets a return to F09 debt level of SF18bn by F12, which would imply continuing share buy backs at around SF10bn pa.
-As to L’Oreal, we reiterate our conviction that Nestle would be interested in taking the full control of the company.

Nestle trades at 14.9xP/E and 8.6xEV/EBITDA based on our 2011 estimates, which leaves further upside for such a quality stock. We confirm our valuation range of SF59-62 per share.

Long Nestle at time of writing.

L’Oreal

August 27, 2010

Stock price: €77.4
Conclusion: L’Oreal’s return to market share gains coupled with good visibility on the margin front justify its current valuation. H1 results lead us to reiterate both our estimates and our valuation range (€83-€86 per share).

H1 results: Sales up 10.2% reported to €9.7bn (+6.3% organic)-EBIT +21%-Net earnings +16.5% to €1.4bn-EPS +15.3%. No guidance for the year, but management confident to strengthen positions and profitability.

We find the current valuation sustainable for three reasons.

Superior visibility on the top line front
-New markets are driving cosmetics growth (+3+4%). New markets account for more than half of the total market and close to 90% of global growth (+9.5% in H1). Asia and Latam grew respectively by 10% and 13% in H1, more than offsetting flat demand in Western Europe and only 2% growth in the US. Management expects new markets to continue to fuel growth in H2 and beyond 2010.
-L’Oreal is expanding 1.5x faster than peers. L’Oreal outperformed competitors everywhere, in new markets (+13%) but also in the US (+5%) and in Western Europe (+2%). Innovation should again drive sales in H2, notably Lancome (Teint Miracle) YSL (Rouge Pur), new perfumes (Belle d’Opium, Acqua di Gioia, and Big Pony Collection from RL). We expect new markets to account for 37% of sales in 2010 and to become the first zone next year ahead of Western Europe.

Positive leverage
-Pricing remain under control with +0.7% net price impact in H1 unlike some competitors.
- Gross margin should be slightly up this year, helped by productivity gains, purchasing and distribution savings and positive mix less hedging costs.
-Commercial and administrative costs will decrease as a percentage of sales, more than compensating for higher advertising and promotion expenses.
We look for sales up 12.4% to €19.6bn, EBIT margin to reach 15.5% and net earnings to increase 16.8% to €2330m (minor change vs our previous estimate due to higher taxation).

Very strong balance sheet
-We look for €2.2bn free cash in 2010
-Net debt could fall to €760m by the end of december and L’Oreal could turn net cash positive next year (€700m).
-According to management acquisitions in emerging markets should remain the priority in the future.

L’Oreal trades at 17.3xP/E and 9.4xEV/EBITDA (excluding Sanofi-Aventis) based on our 2011 estimates. We think such a premium looks justified by its superior visibility but leaves little upside for the next 12 months.

Procter Gamble

August 6, 2010

Stock price:$59.8
Conclusion: P&G looks in good shape in tough conditions. Market share is up, combined with improved margin. We reconfirm our valuation target of $73-$75 per share.

FY10 results: Sales up 3% (+4% organic) to $78.9bn (+4% Q4)-EBIT +4% (20.3% margin)-Core EPS $3.67 up +6%. Guidance F11: net sales (+4-6% organic) EPS expected to be in the range of $3.91-$4.01 up +7-9%.

Value share up 50bp
Sales growth reached +4% (organic) both for the full year and Q4.
-Growth increasingly driven by volume. Volume growth reached +4% for the year and doubled to +8% in the fourth quarter. Volume in emerging markets are booming (+12%) which was expected. The good news comes from volume in mature markets which increased 5% at a time when most competitors are struggling with lower sales (cf Unilever in Western Europe)
-Value growth held back by lower mix (-1% FY -3% Q4) and to a lesser extent pricing (-1%). Faster growth in emerging markets combined with trading down led to sharply negative mix impact.
- Organic growth accelerated in key categories in Q4, notably beauty or grooming. Fabric care and Home care is the exception with flat sales resulting from a very agressive pricing strategy.

Underlying gain in margin looks strong.
Operating margin was up 30bp for the year, despite the negative impact of higher advertising charges (+120bp).
-Gross margin rose 250bp (+50bp in Q4) providing room for manoeuvre. Costs savings in Q4 (+200bp) added to volume leverage (+100bp) more than offset negative price/mix (-200bp) and higher commodity costs (-50bp).
-We welcome the return to higher advertising spending ($1bn more in F10) in order to support a strong innovation pipeline. SG&A rose sharply in Q4, heavily impacted by marketing expenses, mainly responsible for the decline in profitability. We share management’s view that the profitability should be reviewed on a yearly basis and don’t think one should overplay quaterly variations.

Guidance F11: too high ?
Guidance of +7 to +9% EPS growth might look ambitious in light of the negative impact expected from forex and commodities this year.
-We think top line could slightly exceed F10 performance for two reasons: first, volume will be fueled by the innovations which took place late last year (new Pantene, Fusion Pro Glide..) plus the roll out of brands in new markets in oral care and skin care. Second, pricing could turn neutral for the full year (still negative in H1) as Procter will start annualizing some price decreases (batteries, detergents or paper towel in the US). Mix should continue to hold back sales impacted by further trading down.
-Gross margin could further improve helped by savings from productivity and simplification initiatives ($400m to be invested in F11) while advertising spending could remain stable as a percentage to sales.
-EPS growth will be enhanced (+2-3%) by share buy back estimated between $6-$8bn this year.
We look for $81.7bn sales-$17bn EBIT-core EPS of $3.92 per share (+6.8%).

P&G trades at 15.8xPE based on our calendar estimates, well below its 17x average. We think that accelerating top line and bridging the gap with peers such as best in class Reckitt should help to rerate the stock. Our DCF suggests a valuation closer to $75 per share.

PPR

August 2, 2010

Stock price:€104.1
Conclusion: We reconfirm that PPR could be worth €115-120 per share, offering 15% upside potential. The marked improvement in retail bodes well for future disposals and further focus on luxury and lifestyle.

Bottom line surprisingly strong in retail
-Top line grew low single digit in H1 held back by subdued demand in France and in Europe. Redcats remained negative, while Fnac grew 3% and Conforama went up 6%.
-Bottom line went up strongly (EBIT up+39% in retail) driven by excellent cost control, sourcing gains and pricing at Conforama and Redcats. According to PPR, the gain in H1 reflects structural improvement both on the revenue and the cost sides implying further progress in profitability in the second half of the year.

Top line growth in luxury and lifestyle slightly disappointing.
-Puma sales declined by 5% in H1, impacted by the restructuring of the retail network, combined with lower promotional sales compared with H1 last year and with inventory related issues. Nevertheless, bottom line was preserved with a 130bp gain in margin in H1 and +4% EBIT. H2 should show a return to growth based on the existing order book.
-Luxury sales rose +8.5% in H1, lagging behind Hermès and LVMH. Gucci group performed well in Asia (+24%) and in Europe (+10%) but suffered in the US with only 2% growth. The management of the Gucci brand in the US failed to reposition the brand. The team has been changed and PPR is now looking for a visible improvement in H2. Bottega Veneta and Yves Saint Laurent performed well in H1 but they are still relatively less exposed than Gucci to Asia. Operating earnings at Gucci group rose +23% posting a 200bp gain to 20% of sales in H1.
According to the CEO F.H Pinault, sales growth could slightly accelerate in H2 in luxury and lifestyle while the trend in retail could remain unchanged. We are now looking for €17.5bn (+5.9%)- EBIT €1668m (9.5% margin) and net results of €917m (up 28% against +16% previously).

PPR trades at 14.3x P/E and 8.1xEV/EBITDA based on our 2010 estimates, implying 25-30% discount to peers in the luxury sector. We think that the strong achievement on the retail side bode well for future disposals. We feel that the stock looks cheap in light of its expected portfolio restructuring and migration towards luxury and lifestyle. Our valuation suggests 15% upside potential.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.